Advances in antibody-drug conjugates for gynecologic malignancies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a new class of drugs that combine a surface receptor-targeting antibody linked to a cytotoxic molecule delivering the potent cytotoxic payload directly to tumor cells. This review summarizes the current literature demonstrating their use in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies. RECENT FINDINGS: Tisotumab vedotin is the first U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ADC for the treatment of gynecologic cancers. While in the phase 3 randomized controlled trial in platinum resistant ovarian cancer patients, FORWARD 1, mirvetuximab did not meet its primary endpoint of progression-free survival. But we await more recent data from the two ongoing phase 3 trials of mirvetuximab in recurrent ovarian cancer patients. HER2/neu, Napi2b, mesothelin, and human trophoblast cell-surface marker (Trop-2) overexpression have also been exploited as excellent targets by novel ADCs in multiple tumors including ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers. SUMMARY: Current evidence strongly supports the use of ADCs and ongoing clinical trials will provide further information into the potential of making these drugs part of current standard practice allowing patients to be treated with a higher level of personalized cancer care.

Targeted Therapies in the Treatment of Uterine Serous Carcinoma.

OPINION STATEMENT: Despite the dismal prognosis of uterine serous carcinoma (USC), recent advances in molecular classification and targeted treatments have demonstrated improvements in survival outcomes for patients both in the upfront and recurrent treatment settings. After appropriate surgical staging and surgical cytoreduction as indicated, correct pathologic and molecular classification of USC is important to provide the most appropriate systemic adjuvant treatment. HER2-targeted agents are one of the most important advances in the treatment of USC in decades. Thus, for HER2-positive tumors, the addition of trastuzumab to conventional chemotherapy is indicated in those with advanced stage and/or recurrent disease. Treatment with pembrolizumab and lenvatinib suggests a 50% response rate in women with recurrent disease which serves as a promising targeted treatment strategy. Overall, emerging targeted therapeutic options with antibody-drug conjugates (i.e. targeting HER2, folic acid receptor alpha, or Trop-2), combinations of immunotherapies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, PARP inhibitors, WEE1 inhibitors, and AKT inhibitors shed further promise in advancements of effective disease-modifying treatments for this unmet medical need for patients with USC. Several trials evaluating these targeted agents are ongoing, and those results are eagerly awaited. As such, enrollment of patients in clinical trials is highly recommended as it will provide patients with a higher level of personalized cancer care.

Targeted treatment options for the management of metastatic/persistent and recurrent cervical cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Cervical cancer is the overall fourth most common malignancy and the fourth most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Despite vaccination and screening programs, many women continue to present with advanced stage cervical cancer, wherein the treatment options have been limited. AREAS COVERED: In this review, immunotherapy and the potential targeted therapies that have demonstrated promise in the treatment of persistent, recurrent, and metastatic cervical cancer are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Our global goal in the gynecologic oncology community is to eliminate cervical cancer, by increasing the uptake of preventive vaccination and screening programs. For unfortunate patients who present with metastatic, persistent, and recurrent cervical cancer, pembrolizumab with chemotherapy, with or without bevacizumab is the new first-line therapy for PD-L1 positive patients. For this patient population as a second-line therapy, tisotumab vedotin (i.e. ADC) has shown significant efficacy in phase II trials, leading to the US Food and Drug Administration approval. Combination regimens inclusive of immune checkpoint inhibitors, DNA damage repair inhibitors, and antibody drug conjugates are potential breakthrough treatment strategies and are currently being investigated.

Synergistic activity of neratinib in combination with olaparib in uterine serous carcinoma overexpressing HER2/neu.

INTRODUCTION: Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is an aggressive variant of endometrial cancer with a poor prognosis. Approximately 30% of USC overexpress HER2/neu, a recognized target for trastuzumab in advanced/recurrent HER2/neu-positive USC. We evaluated the efficacy of the pan-c-erb inhibitor neratinib and the poly (ADP-ribose)-polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib as single agents and in combination against USC cell lines and xenografts. METHODS: In-vitro cell-viability assays with olaparib, neratinib, and olaparib/neratinib were assessed using flow-cytometry based assays against a panel of USC cell lines with high and low HER2/neu expression. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) signatures were evaluated as described by Alexandrov et al. (Nature;2020;578:94-101) while downstream signaling affected by neratinib/olaparib exposure was assessed with immunoblotting. Efficacy of single- versus dual-agent inhibition was evaluated in-vivo using two USC-xenografts with 3+ HER2/neu expression. RESULTS: Neratinib was more potent than olaparib in suppression of in-vitro growth of HER2/neu 3+ cell lines (ARK1: p = 0.0047; ARK2: p = 0.0428) while no difference was noted against HER2/neu 1+ tumors (ARK4). Importantly, the combination of olaparib with neratinib synergistically improved tumor suppression compared to either single-agent in vitro. USC cells exposed to olaparib upregulated HER2/neu expression, while neratinib treatment increased PARP activity (ARK1: p < 0.0001; ARK2: p < 0.0001). Single-agent neratinib transiently inhibited in vivo growth of USC xenografts harboring HER2/neu gene amplification (ARK1: p < 0.05; ARK2: p < 0.05). In contrast, the combination of the two inhibitors caused a stronger and durable growth inhibition in both USC xenografts (ARK1: p < 0.05; ARK2: p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The combination of olaparib and neratinib is active and synergistic against primary HER2/neu + USC. This combination may represent a novel therapeutic option for USC patients with HER2/neu+, homologous recombination-proficient tumors resistant to chemotherapy.

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) signature-3 in ovarian and uterine carcinosarcomas correlates with preclinical sensitivity to Olaparib, a poly (adenosine diphosphate [ADP]- ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor.

OBJECTIVES: Carcinosarcoma (CS) of the ovary and uterus are highly aggressive malignancies associated with poor survival. Poly(ADP-ribose)-polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are targeted agents impairing DNA repair via homologous-recombination-deficiency (HRD) mechanisms. We used whole-exome-sequencing (WES) data from a cohort of fresh tumor samples of ovarian (OCS) and uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS), primary cell lines and xenografts to investigate the role for olaparib in CSs. METHODS: WES data from 73 CS samples (48 UCS and 25 OCS) were analyzed for HRD signatures. Olaparib activity was evaluated using cell-viability, cell-cycle, apoptosis and cytotoxicity assays against primary CS cell lines. Olaparib antitumor activity was tested in vivo against HRD CS xenografts. RESULTS: Signature-3 (i.e. HRD-related signature) was identified in 60% of OCS (15 of 25) vs 25% of UCS (12 of 48) (p = 0.005). CS cell lines harboring Signature-3/HRD (3 OCS/1 UCS) were significantly more sensitive to olaparib when compared to HRP cell lines (5 UCS/1 OCS) [mean IC50 ± SEM = 2.94 µM ± 0.07 vs mean ± SEM = 23.3 µM ± 0.09, (p = 0.02), respectively]. PARPi suppressed CS cell growth through cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase and caused more apoptosis in HRD vs HRP primary tumors (p < 0.0001). In vivo, olaparib significantly impaired HRD CS xenografts tumor growth (p = 0.0008) and increased overall animal survival (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: OCS and UCS cell lines harboring HRD signature-3 were significantly more sensitive to olaparib in vitro and in vivo when compared to HRP CS. Clinical studies with PARPi in CS patients with a dominant signature 3 (HRD-related) are warranted.

Robotic interval debulking with radical hysterectomy and partial urinary bladder resection for locally advanced carcinosarcoma of the uterus.

•Extensive ureterolysis due to the lateral extent of the tumor with postoperative ureteral stenting.•Partial urinary bladder cystectomy due to clinical concern for invasion followed by two-layer cystorrhapy.•'Port-hopping' for development of the bilateral tunnels of Wertheim with the Vessel Sealer Extend.

Minimally Invasive Ovarian-Preserving Approach for the Management of a Sclerosing Stromal Tumor in an Adolescent: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Sclerosing stromal tumors (SSTs) are rare benign ovarian tumors that occur in adolescents and young adults. They are often treated with unilateral salpingo-oopherectomy due to concern for malignancy. CASE: A 13-year-old postpubertal female presented with sharp, constant abdominal pain with physical exam concerning for a lower abdominal mass. An ultrasound revealed a 9.7-cm solid, heterogenous left ovarian mass. The abdomen and pelvis CT confirmed the findings and showed a predominantly cystic mass arising from the left adnexa. During surgery, a smooth and distinct mass arising from the left ovary was encountered without abnormal findings in surrounding structures. A cystectomy was performed, and intraoperative findings showed no evidence of malignancy. Based on the lab, imaging, and surgical findings, staging and salpingo-oopherectomy were not pursued. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION: Given the benign nature of SSTs, it is important to entertain the diagnosis in adolescents presenting with clinically congruent ovarian masses. The minimally invasive approach allows for sparing of the ovary in the adolescent population.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for recurrent endometrial cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy. Outcomes for patients with advanced and/or recurrent disease have been modest with the use of chemotherapy. The approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1 has recently revolutionized human cancer treatment. Recent trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors used alone or in combination with other agents, have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in the treatment of the all-comers EC patient population. AREAS COVERED: In this article, we review major clinical trials on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced and recurrent EC and discuss the response rates of these agents in the context of their genomic background. EXPERT OPINION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have significantly changed our approach to the treatment of advanced/recurrent EC. Single agent anti-PD-1 regimens are highly effective in MMRd/MSI-H patients, but their clinical efficacy remains modest in MMR proficient/TMB low EC patients. Combination regimens that can decrease the tumor microenvironments immunosuppression and increase tumor immunogenicity represent a viable treatment option to broaden the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced/recurrent EC patients. An increased understanding of the biomarkers of response and the molecular mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors remains key for the next advancement of the field.

Randomised phase II trial of weekly ixabepilone ± biweekly bevacizumab for platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer.

BACKGROUND: This multi-center RP2 study assessed activity/safety of ixabepilone + bevacizumab compared to ixabepilone in platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer. Additional objectives were to examine the role of prior bevacizumab and taxanes, and explore class III-ß-tubulin (TUBB3) as a predictive biomarker. METHODS: Participants were randomised to receive ixabepilone 20 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15 with (IXA + BEV) or without (IXA) bevacizumab 10 mg/kg days 1, 15 every 28 days. Patients were stratified by prior BEV. The primary endpoint was PFS. OS, safety, and ORR served as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Among 76 evaluable patients who received IXA + BEV (n = 39) compared to IXA (n = 37), the ORR was 33% (n = 13) versus 8% (n = 3)(P = 0.004), durable at 6 months in 37% (n = 14) and 3% (n = 1) (P < 0.001). BEV significantly improved PFS (median:5.5 vs 2.2 months, HR = 0.33, 95%CI 0.19-0.55, P < 0.001) and OS (median:10.0 vs 6.0 months, HR = 0.52, 95%CI 0.31-0.87, P = 0.006). Both regimens were well-tolerated. TUBB3 expression did not predict response. Subgroup analyses revealed minimal effect of prior BEV or taxane resistant/refractory status on response to IXA + BEV. CONCLUSIONS: IXA + BEV is a well-tolerated, effective combination for platinum/taxane-resistant ovarian cancer that extends PFS and likely OS relative to IXA monotherapy. Prior receipt of BEV should not preclude the use of IXA + BEV. TUBB3 is not a predictive biomarker. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT3093155.

Clinicopathologic characteristics and oncologic outcomes in adenosarcoma of gynecologic sites.

OBJECTIVE: To examine clinicopathologic characteristics and oncologic outcomes of patients diagnosed with Mullerian adenosarcoma and to evaluate ovarian preservation as a practical management option in early-stage disease. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 31 patients treated for uterine, ovarian, or cervical adenosarcoma at our institution between 1/2000-3/2020. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier estimates, the log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Median age was 51 years (IQR: 41-68). Primary sites included uterine corpus (n = 23, 74.2%), uterine cervix (n = 7, 22.6%), and ovary (n = 1, 3.2%). Surgical management primarily consisted of total hysterectomy +/- bilateral adnexectomy +/- lymph node dissection. Fifteen (48.1%) patients underwent lymph node dissection; no patients had positive nodes. Ovaries were preserved in 6 (19.4%). Twenty-two (71.0%) patients received no adjuvant therapy, 4 (12.9%) received chemotherapy, 1 (3.2%) received chemoradiation, and 3 (9.7%) received hormonal therapy. Sarcomatous overgrowth (p = 0.04), high grade histology (p = 0.002), and greater depth of myometrial invasion (p = 0.001) were associated with decreased RFS. None of the 6 patients with ovarian preservation had recurrences. At last follow up, 21 patients (67.7%) had no evidence of disease, 7 (22.6%) were deceased due to disease, and 3 (9.7%) were deceased due to non-cancerous reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Uterine adenosarcoma appears to have a relatively good prognosis, especially in the absence of risk factors, such as sarcomatous overgrowth, high grade histology, and deep myometrial invasion. Ovarian preservation may be a feasible management option with non-inferior outcomes for premenopausal women with early-stage disease. Future studies including larger patient cohorts are needed for this rare disease.

A phase 2 evaluation of pembrolizumab for recurrent Lynch-like versus sporadic endometrial cancers with microsatellite instability.

BACKGROUND: Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is a biomarker for responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Whether mechanisms underlying microsatellite instability alter responses to ICIs is unclear. This article reports data from a prospective phase 2 pilot study of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent MSI-H endometrial cancer (EC) analyzed by whole exome sequencing (WES) and potential mechanisms of primary/secondary ICI resistance (NCT02899793). METHODS: Patients with measurable MSI-H/dMMR EC confirmed by polymerase chain reaction/immunohistochemistry were evaluated by WES and received 200 mg of pembrolizumab every 3 weeks for ≤2 years. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (24 evaluable) were treated. Six patients (25%) harbored Lynch/Lynch-like tumors, whereas 18 (75%) had sporadic EC. The tumor mutation burden was higher in Lynch-like tumors (median, 2939 mutations/megabase [Mut/Mb]; interquartile range [IQR], 867-5108 Mut/Mb) than sporadic tumors (median, 604 Mut/Mb; IQR, 411-798 Mut/Mb; P = .0076). The ORR was 100% in Lynch/Lynch-like patients but only 44% in sporadic patients (P = .024). The 3-year PFS and OS proportions were 100% versus 30% (P = .017) and 100% versus 43% (P = .043), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests prognostic significance of Lynch-like cancers versus sporadic MSI-H/dMMR ECs for ORR, PFS, and OS when patients are treated with pembrolizumab. Larger confirmatory studies in ECs and other MSI-H/dMMR tumors are necessary. Defective antigen processing/presentation and deranged induction in interferon responses serve as mechanisms of resistance in sporadic MSI-H ECs. Oligoprogression in MSI-H/dMMR patients appears salvageable with surgical resection and/or local treatment and the continuation of pembrolizumab off study. Clinical studies evaluating separate MSI-H/dMMR EC subtypes treated with ICIs are warranted.

An evaluation of prognostic factors, oncologic outcomes, and management for primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prognostic factors, outcomes, and management patterns of patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. METHODS: One hundred sixty-four women were retrospectively identified with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva treated at our institution between 1/1996-12/2018. Descriptive statistics were performed on patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. The χ² tests and t-tests were used to compare categorical variables and continuous variables, respectively. Recurrence free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier estimates, the log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 52.5 months. Five-year RFS was 67.9%, 60.0%, 42.1%, and 20.0% for stage I-IV, respectively. Five-year DSS was 86.2%, 81.6%, 65.0%, and 42.9% for stage I-IV, respectively. On multivariate analysis, positive margins predicted overall RFS (hazard ratio [HR]=3.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.18-10.73; p=0.025), while presence of lichen sclerosus on pathology (HR=2.78; 95% CI=1.30-5.91; p=0.008) predicted local RFS. OS was predicted by nodal involvement (HR=2.51; 95% CI=1.02-6.13; p=0.043) and positive margins (HR=5.19; 95% CI=2.03-13.26; p=0.001). Adjuvant radiotherapy significantly improved RFS (p=0.016) and DSS (p=0.012) in node-positive patients. Median survival after treatment of local, groin, and pelvic/distant recurrence was 52, 8, and 5 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: For primary treatment, more conservative surgical approaches can be considered with escalation of treatment in patients with concurrent precursor lesions, positive margins, and/or nodal involvement. Further studies are warranted to improve risk stratification in order to optimize treatment paradigms for vulvar cancer patients.

Microtubule-Interfering Drugs: Current and Future Roles in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Treatment.

Taxanes and epothilones are chemotherapeutic agents that ultimately lead to cell death through inhibition of normal microtubular function. This review summarizes the literature demonstrating their current use and potential promise as therapeutic agents in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), as well as putative mechanisms of resistance. Historically, taxanes have become the standard of care in the front-line and recurrent treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. In the past few years, epothilones (i.e., ixabepilone) have become of interest as they may retain activity in taxane-treated patients since they harbor several features that may overcome mechanisms of taxane resistance. Clinical data now support the use of ixabepilone in the treatment of platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian cancer. Clinical data strongly support the use of microtubule-interfering drugs alone or in combination in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. Ongoing clinical trials will shed further light into the potential of making these drugs part of current standard practice.

DHES0815A, a novel antibody-drug conjugate targeting HER2/neu, is highly active against uterine serous carcinomas in vitro and in vivo.

OBJECTIVE: Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is an aggressive histologic variant of endometrial cancer which portends a poor prognosis. DHES0815A is a novel antibody-drug-conjugate (ADC) which binds specifically to HER2 overexpressing tumors at a distinct epitope from that bound by trastuzumab and pertuzumab after which it delivers the toxic payload, PBD-MA, a DNA mono-alkylating agent. The objective of this study was to evaluate the preclinical activity of DHES0815A against primary USC cell lines and xenografts. METHODS: Twelve primary USC cell lines were assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for HER2 protein expression and for C-erbB2 gene amplification using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. Cell viability and bystander killing in USC cell lines after exposure to DHES0815A, the non-targeted ADC, and the unconjugated antibody (i.e. MHES0488A) were evaluated using flow cytometry-based-assays. In vivo activity of DHES0815A was tested against HER2/neu overexpressing USC xenografts. RESULTS: High HER2/neu protein expression was seen in 25% (3/12) of the primary USC cell lines. USC cell lines overexpressing HER2/neu were significantly more sensitive to DHES0815A when compared to the non-targeted control ADC (p < 0.001). DHES0815A did not induce significant bystander killing of HER2/neu negative tumors when admixed with HER2/neu positive tumors. DHES0815A caused growth-inhibition and increased survival in USC HER2/neu overexpressing xenografts when compared to controls (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: DHES0815A is both highly selective and toxic to USC tumors overexpressing HER2/neu both in vitro and in vivo. HER2-directed ADCs, alone or in combination with other HER2/neu targeted agents may represent a novel treatment option for patients with tumors harboring HER2/neu overexpression refractory to trastuzumab and traditional chemotherapy.

Financial toxicity in patients with gynecologic malignancies: a cross sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate financial toxicity and assess its risk factors among patients with gynecologic cancers. METHODS: This is a cross sectional study that included 2 survey tools, as well as patient demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment regimen. Financial toxicity is measured by validated Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) tool. Participants were also asked to complete a 55-question-survey on attitudes and perspectives surrounding cost of care. Descriptive statistics was used to report patient demographics. Spearman's rank correlation was calculated to assess the relation between financial toxicity and patient/disease related variables. Graphpad Prism Software Version 8.0 was used for analyses. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients with various gynecologic malignancies were enrolled. Median COST score was 20.5 (range, 1-33). Sixty-five percent of the patients reported being in debt due to their cancer care and 4% filed bankruptcy. Correlation analysis showed that COST score was correlated with age (r=-0.3, p=0.028), malignancy type (r=0.3, p=0.039) and income (r=0.3, p=0.047). Ovarian cancer patients had significantly less financial toxicity (median COST score=23) when compared to patients with other gynecologic malignancies (median COST score=17, p=0.043). When scores were dichotomized into low (score ≥22) and high toxicity (score <22), 58% (29/50) of the patients were noted to have high financial toxicity. Enrollment to a clinical trial did not significantly alleviate financial burden. CONCLUSION: Financial toxicity is a significant burden even among highly insured gynecologic oncology patients. Age, malignancy type and income were correlated with high financial burden.

Trastuzumab tolerability in the treatment of advanced (stage III-IV) or recurrent uterine serous carcinomas that overexpress HER2/neu.

OBJECTIVE: Due to previously reported trastuzumab safety concerns and the scant data available in endometrial cancer patients, we sought to assess the safety, tolerability and toxicity profile of trastuzumab in patients with advanced/recurrent uterine serous carcinoma (USC) that overexpress HER2/neu in our multicenter randomized phase II trial. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive carboplatin/paclitaxel (C/P) for 6 cycles ± trastuzumab (T) with the experimental arm continuing to receive single agent trastuzumab maintenance treatment until disease progression/toxicity. Progression-free-survival was the primary endpoint; overall-survival and toxicity were secondary endpoints. Adverse events (AEs) were compared between treatment arms. RESULTS: There were 28 patients in the C/P arm and 32 patients in the experimental (C/P + T) arm. Fifty-eight patients (97%) experienced 977 treatment-related AEs of which 875 (89.6%) were low-grade (grade 1-2) and 102 (10.4%) were high-grade (grade 3-5). The mean ± standard deviation of AEs per patient was 15.5 ± 16.3 in the C/P arm and 17.0 ± 16.0 in the C/P + T arm. Gastrointestinal AEs were the most common in both arms (n = 155, 15.7%) of which 94.2% were low-grade (n = 146). Importantly, no significant difference between treatment arms was detected in any system-organ class of AE including cardiac AE. Five (17%) of 29 patients who received prolonged trastuzumab maintenance therapy had no sign of cumulative toxicity after an average (range) of 5.1 (4.2-6.3) years. CONCLUSIONS: Trastuzumab appears to be safe and has a manageable toxicity profile both when used in combination with chemotherapy and when used for single agent maintenance in patients with HER2/neu positive USC. This safety profile is reassuring given the proven efficacy of trastuzumab in advanced/recurrent HER2/neu positive USC.

Variability in the identification of lymphovascular space invasion for early stage cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the inter- and intra-rater variability of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) in early stage cervical cancer. METHODS: We identified invasive cervical cancer tissue samples from radical hysterectomies in our institutional pathology database. The cases were stained with Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E) and immunostains (CD-31 and D2-40). They were evaluated for the presence of LVSI by 6 pathologists on 3 separate occasions: with H&E staining only, then with H&E and immunostained specimens, and finally using a shared written criterion for diagnosis of LVSI. With 80 cases, a two-sided 95% confidence interval for the Kappa of 0.7 with a precision of 0.1 on each side was estimated. RESULTS: Stage distribution was: IA 10%, IB 85%, and IIA 5%. The majority of cases were squamous cell carcinoma (55%), followed by adenocarcinoma (39%) and adenosquamous or other histology (6%). The mean inter-rater Kappa was 0.41 (95% CI: 0.37-0.45) for H&E. Usage of immunohistochemistry made a statistically significant improvement in the mean Kappa, but it still remained low: 0.52 (p = 0.02). Adding evaluation criteria for LVSI did not significantly increase the mean Kappa: 0.49 (p = 0.16). The mean intra-rater variability of H&E staining alone compared with H&E staining plus immunostaining was 0.53 (range: 0.43-0.64). The mean Kappa comparing H&E staining and H&E staining with criteria was 0.50 (range: 0.40-0.59). CONCLUSIONS: We noted high inter- and intra-rater variability in the diagnosis of LVSI underscoring the challenges of LVSI diagnosis. Considering the significance assigned to LVSI and its implication for treatment, comprehensive guidelines with regards to determination of LVSI status are of paramount importance.

Immunotherapy in Cervical Cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to summarize the current immunotherapy studies and the potential targeted therapies showing promise in the treatment of cervical cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: There are promising ongoing monotherapy and combination therapy trials using different immune checkpoint inhibitors, poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitors, tumor angiogenesis inhibitors (i.e., bevacizumab), antibody-drug conjugates, therapeutic vaccines, and tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes (adoptive immunotherapy). Some of these novel modalities are also being evaluated in combination with standard platinum-based chemotherapy regimen. At this time, pembrolizumab is approved for the treatment of relapsed or metastatic programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive cervical cancer after frontline chemotherapy treatment. Multiple novel therapeutic modalities are emerging as safe and effective for the treatment of cervical cancer patients. Development and participation in investigative treatments can provide benefit and improve outcomes in cervical cancer.